BPW CANADA     

BPW CANADA
The Canadian Federation of Business & Professional Women's Clubs (CFBPWC)


BPW CANADA     

MAP

Français or Home Page
Visitor's Page
Front Page News
o BPW Canada Soapbox
o Club News
o BPW Virtual Club
o Convention 2008
o Recent/Upcoming
   Events

o Newsletters
   & Correspondence

o Memorials
Priority Issues:
o Childcare Campaign
o Income Equity
o Women in Politics
About BPW
o Constitution/Bylaws
o History
o Scrapbook
o Leadership Awards
o BPW Salutes
Committees:
o Federation Promotion
   Publicity & PR

o Health
o International
o Personal Develop-
   ment & Mentoring

o Programs/Projects
o Public Affairs
o Resolutions & Briefs
o Ways & Means
o Young BPW
Membership
o Form 100-
   Part 1 (Word)
o Form 100-Part 2
    (Word) or (Excel)
o Membership Form
BPW Emblems
Links & Resources
Contact Us
E-mail
MESSAGES TO MEMBERS OF BPW CANADA
From Fran Donaldson, President
French Version

More Women Working Will Make Our Country Work Better

This is the title of a CanWest News Service article by Daphne Bramham.

There may be a magic bullet for solving some of our society's most difficult problems, such as a lack of affordable housing, immigration, productivity declines, an aging workforce or the near-crippling demands on the pension system.

Make it easier for women to get into the paid workforce. According to a study done by Goldman Sachs, the global investment banking and securities firm, making it easier for women to get into the paid workforce would that increase family incomes, making homes more attainable, boosting gross domestic product and decreasing dependency on imported labour. And, perhaps surprisingly, it almost certainly would increase the number of Canadian-born babies.

The Goldman Sachs researchers cite an Organization for Economic Development and Cooperation study which found 77 per cent of European couples believe the ideal is to have both partners in full or part-time employment, but only 53 per cent were able to live that way. (Canada was not included in any of the research, but its female workforce participation rate of 62 per cent last month is roughly equivalent to that of the United States, but falls behind those of Sweden and Denmark by close to 10 percentage points.)

For Janet Austin, chief executive officer, attacking homelessness isn't only about building more houses or shelters, it must be more holistic and include everything from job training to child care.

The April 2007 Goldman Sachs report contradicts some of the most common arguments governments make against implementing policies that would result in more women working such as: Governments should not interfere with family life. They already do. Analysis of existing tax and benefits policies in eight developed countries indicated; "the status quo in most countries actively discourages female employment."

The report notes the inadequate supply of good-quality, affordable child care as the chief impediment to women taking full-time paid employment, followed by inadequate parental leave provisions.

Governments providing child-care subsidies conditional on employment have been shown to consistently and significantly boost the number of women who work. However, child benefits paid to all parents (as Canada's Conservative government chose to do, rather than implementing a universal daycare program) “may act to reduce labour supply.” As for parental leave, Goldman Sachs research concludes that it encourages women to work and makes it easier for them to re-enter the workforce after they have had children.

But there are down sides. The most significant is that in the absence of anti-discrimination policies (or the provision of paternity leave in addition to maternity leave), companies may be reluctant to hire women at all. And that's linked to something the study barely touches on, but an issue that Austin believes is key - the gender wage gap.

In 2005, Canadian women earned 23 per cent less on average than men and Statistics Canada data from 2003 indicates that only a quarter of women in dual-income families are the highest wage earners. So, when it comes to deciding who should take parental leave, Austin says it's a no-brainer. Couples want to forgo the lower income and that's almost invariably the woman's.

Then, because it's almost inevitably women taking the parental leaves, she says employers faced with two equal candidates - male and female - will almost invariably choose the man.

Another myth suggests that higher female employment results in a lower birth rate. Nonsense, says Goldman Sachs. “This claim is simply contradicted by the facts . . . Fertility is positively correlated with high female employment.”

More simply, countries with the best child-care policies not only have a higher proportion of women in the workforce, they also have higher fertility rates.

For any remaining naysayers who think child care, parental leave and all of those things are too expensive, Goldman Sachs again says that's simply wrong. “Raising female employment to male employment levels would boost U.S. GDP by as much as nine per cent." Not only that, the report says more affluent women drive the stock market. Since it started its Women 300 Index of companies whose products and services appeal mainly to women, Goldman Sachs says the index has outperformed global equities three to one.


President’s Report 2007

In the past year we celebrated some happy events, such as the 60th anniversaries of the Brampton and Penticton clubs, and welcomed two new clubs - Kitchener-Waterloo and the first francophone club outside Quebec, in South-East New Brunswick. We also mourned the death of notable members, including Bunny Parton, Marjorie Russell and Nancy Bass, whose memories we cherish and whose example will continue to inspire us.

You have received our financial reports for review, but for now, I would like to talk about our activities, achievements and challenges.

First, I would like to say how fortunate I am to have such a talented and devoted team to work with. We really couldn’t have a better group of BPW members from across the country than those who make up this Board of Directors, and I want to thank them all for their dedication throughout the past year.

Our combined efforts have been documented in the List of Activities that has been distributed. We had to work hard to get the list down to four pages, so you can see we have been a very busy bunch. As you can see from the List, we have made internal tasks, mostly management and administration, a priority, because we think that to be an effective “voice of working women” we must have an efficient, well-run organization. The down side is that some of the more rewarding and important work, like advocacy, gets neglected when we run out of time, money, energy, and other resources. So while we have accomplished a lot, it is not clear that we have made much progress toward our grand goals of educating and empowering women.

I would like to mention a few highlights, however, such as our small but active participation in the Status of Women sessions at the UN in New York, and our very visible and effective presence at the Regional Conference in Jamaica last February. Both events emphasized the need and efforts to stop violence against women and girls, and I encourage every club to make this topic part of their program in the coming year.

We have also worked to strengthen our connections with BPW International, and I was delighted to secure the appointment of Doris Hall as sub-regional coordinator. As indicated in the messages received from the International President and Vice-President, the efforts and contributions of BPW Canada are much appreciated. And I would like to echo the comments of International Vice-President Liz Benham about responsibility. Since we are, other than the few scattered members in the US, by far the largest and nearest BPW Federation to New York, we should certainly have one of the largest delegations to the UN each year, not the small turnout we had this year.

On the national scene, while some committees had a relatively quiet year, others were quite active, and we have been working hard to get our voice heard. For example, through the combined efforts of the Barb-to-Fran-to-Sue tag team, we got an invitation to present to the Standing Committee for the Status of Women in Ottawa on the subject of economic security for senior women, and received encouraging feedback to our presentation. We also took plenty of opportunities to make the political leaders of all parties aware of us and of our position on issues.

But if there is one lesson to be learned about advocacy and activism, it is that alone we are pretty powerless, but that if we work with others, we can make a worthwhile contribution and see some results. BPW New Brunswick, for example, joined forces with CFUW in a brief and presentation to the Premier’s Community Non-Profit Task Force. On the national level, starting with contacts among NGOs at the UN, including our 5-0 partners, we have joined the Ad-Hoc Coalition for Equality and Human Rights. Spurred by the continuing changes to the budgets and mandate of Status of Women Canada, and with the likelihood of a federal election in the foreseeable future, the group has adopted the motto “Putting equality back on track.” The goal is to make women’s issues part of the next federal election campaign. Already there is good reason to believe that the outcry led by coalition members was a factor in the minister’s decision to restore some of the funding to SWC.

The other lesson I have learned this year is that our current burn rate (our use of financial and other resources to operate the organization) indicates that we are no longer sustainable. The amount and the kind of work required of the handful of Directors is simply unreasonable, and still we are unable to provide the level and quality of service that our members would like or make significant progress toward our goals. As our International President and Vice-President have said, something has to change.

It is for this reason that yesterday [July 6] Sue Calhoun and I, as co-chairs of the Strategic Long-Range Planning Committee, took the unusual step of holding a special SLRP meeting. All the members of the Board of Directors attended, along with several other members from around the country, who were invited because of the key positions they currently hold. The professional facilitator, Judy Kent, challenged us to re-examine and re-affirm our mission, envision the best feasible future of BPW Canada and identify the actions we must take to actualize that vision. The task was well begun, and we will soon have an initial report from the SLRP meeting, from our rapporteur, Sheila Crook.

In retrospect, I hope the past year will have provided some strength, some tools, some motivation and some small but solid first steps toward a more productive and rewarding future. I invite all of you, with the members you represent here today, to join us in facing that future with enthusiasm and faith, in the spirit of our sisterhood.

Fran Donaldson
July 7, 2007


Rapport de la présidente sur l’exercice 2007

Au cours de la dernière année, nous avons célébré des événements heureux, comme le 60e anniversaire des clubs de Brampton et de Penticton, et avons accueilli deux nouveaux club - un à Kitchener-Waterloo en Ontario ainsi que le premier club francophone hors Québec, établi dans le sud-est du Nouveau-Brunswick. Nous avons également porté le deuil d’adhérentes remarquables – dont Bunny Parton, Marjorie Russel et Nancy Bass – dont nous chérissons le souvenir et continuons de suivre l’exemple.

Vous avez reçu nos états financiers mais pour l’instant, j’aimerais vous entretenir de nos activités, de nos réalisations et des défis relevés.

En premier lieu, j’aimerais vous dire à quel point je suis privilégiée de travailler avec une équipe aussi talentueuse et dévouée. Nous ne pourrions trouver au Canada de meilleures adhérentes que celles qui forment notre Conseil d’administration et je profite de cette occasion pour les remercier du dévouement dont elles ont fait preuve au cours de cet exercice.

Nos efforts combinés figurent dans la liste d’activités qui a été distribuée. Nous avons eu beaucoup de mal à restreindre cette liste à quatre pages, ce qui vous montre que nous avons été très occupées. Comme vous le verrez en parcourant cette liste, nous avons donné la priorité aux tâches internes (principalement de gestion et d’administration) parce que nous croyons que pour bien représenter les femmes au travail, notre organisme doit être exploité efficacement. Malheureusement, certaines tâches plus gratifiantes et plus importantes (comme la plaidoirie) sont négligées lorsque nous manquons de temps, d’argent, d’énergie et d’autres ressources. Nous avons beaucoup fait mais il n’est pas évident que nous ayons beaucoup progressé dans l’atteinte de nos grands objectifs d’éducation et d’autonomisation des femmes.

J’aimerais toutefois mentionner quelques faits saillants, tels notre participation peu nombreuse mais active aux séances de la Commission de la condition de la femme de l’ONU, à New York, et notre présence efficace et très visible au Congrès régional de BPW du mois de février, en Jamaïque. Ces événements ont tous deux mis l’accent sur la nécessité d’arrêter la violence faite aux femmes et aux filles et sur les efforts soutenus en ce sens. J’encourage d’ailleurs tous les clubs à inclure cette cause dans leur programme du prochain exercice.

Nous avons également œuvré au renforcement de nos liens avec BPW International. J’ai été ravie d’assurer la nomination de Doris Hall au poste de coordonnatrice infrarégionale. Comme l’ont indiqué la présidente et la vice-présidente internationales dans leurs messages (également publiés dans ce site Web), la contribution et les efforts fournis par BPW Canada sont très appréciés. J’aimerais d’ailleurs reprendre les commentaires de notre vice-présidente internationale, Liz Benham, au sujet de notre responsabilité. Puisque nous formons de loin la fédération BPW la plus grande et la plus près de New York (mis à part les quelques adhérentes éparpillées aux États-Unis), nous devrions certainement regrouper l’une des plus importantes délégations à l’ONU chaque année au lieu du timide groupe de cette année.>

À l’échelle nationale, certains comités ont été relativement tranquilles cette année mais d’autres ont été très actifs, travaillant d’arrache-pied à faire entendre notre voix de plus en plus faible. À titre d’exemple, grâce aux efforts de l’équipe formée par Barb, Fran et Sue, nous avons été invitées à faire une présentation devant le Comité permanent de la condition féminine, à Ottawa. Nous avons reçu des commentaires encourageants sur cette présentation traitant de la sécurité économique des femmes âgées. Nous avons également profité de maintes occasions pour sensibiliser les chefs de tous les partis politiques à notre organisme et à sa position sur certaines questions.

S’il y a une leçon à tirer au sujet de la plaidoirie et de l’activisme, c’est que seules, nous sommes plutôt impuissantes; en collaborant avec d’autres organismes, nous pouvons faire une contribution louable et obtenir des résultats. Par exemple, le club BPW du Nouveau-Brunswick s’est allié à la FCFDU pour préparer et présenter un mémoire au Groupe d’étude du Premier ministre sur le secteur communautaire sans but lucratif. Sur le plan national, grâce à nos relations avec des ONG de l’ONU (notamment avec nos partenaires des projets 5-0), nous avons joint les rangs de la Coalition spéciale pour l’égalité des femmes et les droits de la personne. Motivé par les continuelles coupures au budget et au mandat de Condition féminine Canada et par la vraisemblance d’une élection fédérale imminente, le groupe a adopté la devise « Remettons l’égalité sur les rails ». Son but consiste à faire des questions féminines un enjeu de la prochaine campagne électorale fédérale. Il y a déjà lieu de croire que le tollé soulevé par les membres de la Coalition a incité le ministre à rendre une partie du financement à CFC.

Cette année m’a également appris que notre temps d’absorption (la vitesse à laquelle nous utilisons nos ressources financières et autres pour exploiter l’organisme) indique que notre organisme n’est pratiquement plus viable. La nature et la quantité des tâches exigées de nos quelques directrices sont simplement déraisonnables et ne nous permettent ni d’offrir la qualité de service que nos adhérentes souhaitent, ni de progresser vers l’atteinte de nos objectifs. Comme l’ont indiqué notre présidente et notre vice-présidente internationales, quelque chose doit changer.

C’est pourquoi, hier (le 6 juillet), Sue Calhoun et moi-même, co-présidentes du comité Planification stratégique à long terme, avons exceptionnellement tenu une réunion spéciale de PSLT. Tous les membres du Conseil d’administration y étaient, de même que plusieurs adhérentes de partout au pays, invitées en raison des postes clés qu’elles occupent. Judy Kent, facilitatrice professionnelle, nous a invitées à réexaminer et à réaffirmer notre mission, à visualiser le meilleur avenir possible pour BPW Canada et à identifier les mesures à prendre pour en faire une réalité. La tâche a débuté sur un bon pied; nous pourrons bientôt vous présenter un compte rendu de cette réunion, préparé par Sheila Crook.

En rétrospective, j’espère que cet exercice nous aura fourni un peu de force, quelques outils, de la motivation et de petits – mais fermes – pas vers un avenir plus productif et plus gratifiant. J’invite chacune d’entre vous, aux côtés des adhérentes que vous représentez, à joindre nos rangs pour affronter notre avenir avec enthousiasme et confiance, dans un esprit de sororité.

Fran Donaldson
7 juillet 2007

UP UP